<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:annotate="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/annotate/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
<!--
	This feed generated for Anonymous
	More info at http://naklon.info/rss/about.htm
-->
<channel>
<title>SAXS</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/</link>
<description>Small Angle X-ray Scattering Initiative for Europe :: Forum</description>
<managingEditor>saxier@embl-hamburg.de</managingEditor>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<generator>RSS Feed 2.2.4</generator>
<language>en</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 06:33:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Rigid Body Modelling :: identical subunits in P1?</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1762#1762</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1762#1762</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=22803&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ewa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: identical subunits in P1?&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.09.07 10:05 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Have I understood it correctly that two identical subunits cannot be modeled in P1 using BUNCH? I have a dimer of two identical monomers, but not symmetry related, according to relevant crystal structures.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>ewa</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Rigid Body Modelling</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1762#1762" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1762</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mixtures and Flexible Systems :: GAJOE terminates prematurely</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1761#1761</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:15:09 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1761#1761</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=13894&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Alexandra&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: GAJOE terminates prematurely&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.09.07 03:15 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi:
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
I have run Ranch and generated pdbs (all in the same directory as the *dat file), now I am trying to run GAJOE on Linux using the default setting, but here is the error I get:
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
CYCLE: 49
&lt;br /&gt;
 Initial genes created
&lt;br /&gt;
 Starting Genetic Algorithm
&lt;br /&gt;
 CYCLE: 50
&lt;br /&gt;
 Initial genes created
&lt;br /&gt;
 Starting Genetic Algorithm
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
mv: cannot stat `04557.pdb': No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
mv: cannot stat `05688.pdb': No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
mv: cannot stat `06780.pdb': No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
mv: cannot stat `07831.pdb': No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
list in: end of file
&lt;br /&gt;
apparent state: internal I/O
&lt;br /&gt;
lately reading direct formatted internal IO
&lt;br /&gt;
 No such file or directory
&lt;br /&gt;
 Experimental file Zero_alexpool_B2and3and5
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
It looks like to program cannot files the files? Is there a specific naming/directory structure one needs?
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks,
&lt;br /&gt;
Alex&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>Alexandra</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Mixtures and Flexible Systems</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1761#1761" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1761</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ab Initio Methods :: DAMCLUST</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1760#1760</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 13:11:41 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1760#1760</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=13894&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Alexandra&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: DAMCLUST&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.09.05 14:11 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
IS there  a reference for DAMCLUST? I would like to know more about how the clustering is done and the use of such clustering algorithms.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
For example, let's say one does multiple simulations for a multidomain protein. For all the reconstructions, the core seems to align well, but one extension seems to adopt multiple oritentiations in the resulting ab initio models. Would you conclude this may correspond to an multiple conformations in solution?
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>Alexandra</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Ab Initio Methods</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1760#1760" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1760</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mixtures and Flexible Systems :: Refining dummy atom positions</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1745#1745</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 12:28:14 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1745#1745</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=22649&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;sdw&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: Refining dummy atom positions&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.09.01 13:28 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi, I have recently collected scattering curves of a protein that I believe is forming homo-tetramers. I believe this because we have collected SAXS data for a truncated version of the protein, for which have tetrameric crystal structure, which gives a excellent chi*2 value in crysol. This same model  fits the SAXS data for the full-length protein very poorly in part, I assume, because the individual monomers are missing approximately 50 residues off their N-termini and 10 residues  of the C-termini. The caveat here is that we expect these missing sequences to be flexible and unstructured.
&lt;br /&gt;
     Obviously I would like to use EOM to build an ensemble of chains that would best fit the data, but if I understand correctly EOM needs (assumes) that you have a monomer of linked structured subunits, rather than an oligomer. As an alternative I have crudely used Ranch to generate a pdb file with  random coil extensions for each chain. (Taking the eomtmp.pdb file generated), and then stitched these models together to generate a very crude model.  This dummy atom extended model gives a better chi*2 fit to my SAXS data (much better than the truncated crystallographic model as well as a CHADD build on this), but could clearly be improved. Therefore I'm wondering if this model can be fed into any ATSAS programme to refine the dummy atom positions against the scattering curve (or more likely the P(r) plot) whilst maintaining correct connectivity of said dummy atoms and  avoiding obvious steric clashes?
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
(Apologies for the long winded question)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>sdw</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Mixtures and Flexible Systems</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1745#1745" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1745</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>SAS Software and Instrumentation :: RE: Problem with Primus</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1744#1744</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:39:41 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1744#1744</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=44&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;konarev&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: Problem with Primus&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.09.01 08:39 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi Arnab,
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
the current version of PRIMUS is compiled for Windows,
&lt;br /&gt;
if you are using windows emulators in Linux/Mac, it can have some
&lt;br /&gt;
problems. 
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
In some cases it is possible to continue to work with PRIMUS
&lt;br /&gt;
even if it gives an error message after starting, you need to press
&lt;br /&gt;
'Ok' button and this message will disappear. 
&lt;br /&gt;
You can also try to run PRIMUS from earlier ATSAS2.2 version,
&lt;br /&gt;
may be on your machine it will work better.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
We have also plans to release a cross-platform version of PRIMUS in
&lt;br /&gt;
next ATSAS release (in October-November 2010).
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Peter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>konarev</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>SAS Software and Instrumentation</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1704#1704" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1744</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>SAS Software and Instrumentation :: RE: Problem with Primus</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1743#1743</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 18:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1743#1743</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=22792&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;arn007c&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.31 19:09 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi Peter,
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Thank you for replying. The problem is it is giving the error before it asks for any input. I was able to work with gnom from the same atsas package which is accepting the input data file in the recommended format. But the primus is not working. It might be a broken file or something I guess. Is there any way to check? Also is there atsas or similar program for mac?
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks,
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Arnab&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>arn007c</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>SAS Software and Instrumentation</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1704#1704" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1743</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Data Processing :: RE: troubles with primus crashing in windows 7- 64 bit</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1742#1742</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1742#1742</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=44&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;konarev&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: primus&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.08.31 17:27 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi 
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
we made some tests for PRIMUS on Windows 7 64-bit machines,
&lt;br /&gt;
and it worked stable, so may be you have some processor-specific 
&lt;br /&gt;
problem or problem connected with your data formats.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
The current version of PRIMUS (in ATSAS 2.3) is compiled for Windows
&lt;br /&gt;
platforms and therefore can have some conflicts when running using 
&lt;br /&gt;
windows emulators from Mac/Linux.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
For next ATSAS releases (2.4 etc) we are planning to make a cross-platform
&lt;br /&gt;
version of PRIMUS and SASPLOT.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers,
&lt;br /&gt;
Peter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>konarev</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Data Processing</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1437#1437" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1742</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mixtures and Flexible Systems :: RE: svdplot</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1741#1741</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1741#1741</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=44&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;konarev&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: svdplot&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.08.31 17:17 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi Terry,
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
if you run SVDPLOT from PRIMUS then you can only see the results 
&lt;br /&gt;
and the plots of singular vectors in the window.
&lt;br /&gt;
To get the files of singular values and singular vectors, one needs
&lt;br /&gt;
to run SVDPLOT (or SVDPLOTQW) separetely in the command line:
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;svdplot datafile.dat /K&amp;quot;,
&lt;br /&gt;
where datafile.dat should contain all experimental curves
&lt;br /&gt;
There will be three output files:
&lt;br /&gt;
_U_.dat  - with singular values
&lt;br /&gt;
_S_.dat  - with singular vectors.
&lt;br /&gt;
_Ncomp.log - with the information for the number of components
&lt;br /&gt;
                    from the statistical test.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Peter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>konarev</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Mixtures and Flexible Systems</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1481#1481" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1741</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mixtures and Flexible Systems :: RE: Adjustment in Oligomer?</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1740#1740</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:01:58 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1740#1740</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=44&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;konarev&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: Adjustment in Oligomer?&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.08.31 17:01 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi Annette,
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
we have already discussed this problem in e-mails, but I want to summarize the important points on the forum as well.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
If you are using OLIGOMER in a standard mode, then the fitted curve should be equal to a &amp;quot;pure&amp;quot; linear combination
&lt;br /&gt;
from the form-factor components with the corresponding coefficinets (volume fractions) multipled by the scaling coeffifient.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
It is also possible to use a key &amp;quot;/cst&amp;quot; (when you run OLIGOMER in batch mode), then additional (constant) component will be added (it can be used when you have poor fit of the experimental curve at higher angles)
&lt;br /&gt;
but this constant component is choosen in such a way that its volume fraction is equal or very close to zero, so you should get the meaningful volume fractions for &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; components and improved fit at higher angles.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Adjust&amp;quot; in PRIMUS finds the scaling and constant coefficients between two curves using least square method (the constant can be positive or negative), whereas in OLIGOMER the system of linear equations is being solved using non-negativity condition for the volume fractions.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Peter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>konarev</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Mixtures and Flexible Systems</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1695#1695" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1740</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mixtures and Flexible Systems :: RE: Mixture run</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1739#1739</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:54:26 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1739#1739</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=44&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;konarev&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.31 16:54 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi, 
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
please try to run the graphic version of mixture (mixtureqw.exe) from PRIMUS or use mixture.exe version from ATSAS2.2.
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems the command-line version of MIXTURE in ATSAS2.3
&lt;br /&gt;
is not running properly on some processors, it will be fixed 
&lt;br /&gt;
in next ATSAS release.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>konarev</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Mixtures and Flexible Systems</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1522#1522" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1739</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rigid Body Modelling :: RE: Merge and Maths</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1738#1738</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:48:51 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1738#1738</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=44&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;konarev&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.31 16:48 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
the data files are  merged using a least-squares fitting in the overlapping range. For this, the experimental data are rebinned onto a new angular master grid and, if requested, the merged curve is recomputed on this grid. This option is useful e.g. for making composite curves from the data
&lt;br /&gt;
recorded in different angular ranges. For all operations, the error
&lt;br /&gt;
propagation is performed using standard equations.
&lt;br /&gt;
Another approach is to join the points in the overlapped region, it works
&lt;br /&gt;
well if you have data on the same grid, this approach was used in the
&lt;br /&gt;
older PRIMUS versions (see ATSAS 2.1), in ATSAS 2.2 and 2.3 
&lt;br /&gt;
the rebinning method is used.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>konarev</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Rigid Body Modelling</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1563#1563" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1738</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>SAS Software and Instrumentation :: RE: Problem with Primus</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1737#1737</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1737#1737</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=44&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;konarev&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: Re: Problem with Primus&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.08.31 16:41 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi Arnab,
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
do you mean, that you could not load your data file
&lt;br /&gt;
in PRIMUS ?  Please, check the correct input format for 
&lt;br /&gt;
data files: it should be in ASCII format and contain 
&lt;br /&gt;
two or three columns: the first column - s-vector, the second column - 
&lt;br /&gt;
intensity, the third column (if exists) - errors of intensity.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Peter&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>konarev</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>SAS Software and Instrumentation</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1704#1704" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1737</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Announcements :: RE: ATSAS version 2.3.1 released</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1735#1735</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:30:06 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1735#1735</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=22814&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;rdobson&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Subject: autoporod&lt;br /&gt;
Posted: 2010.08.31 03:30 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi All, 
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
I wondered how autoporod decided where to cut the data.  Does it do it based on the error of the profile??   Actually, is there a rule of thumb regarding how to truncate noisy data??
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Cheers
&lt;br /&gt;
Ren&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>rdobson</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Announcements</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1231#1231" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1735</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rigid Body Modelling :: RE: Slit smearing in SASREF and BUNCH</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1734#1734</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:03:45 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1734#1734</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=21740&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;david.a.jacques&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 23:03 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
How does this work without asking for a beam profile, or some description of beam geometry?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>david.a.jacques</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Rigid Body Modelling</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1519#1519" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1734</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>PDB Oriented Tools :: RE: Prediction of scattering from dimers in Crysol</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1733#1733</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:45:14 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1733#1733</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 16:45 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
In Crysol, the scattering is not normalized by the concentration
&lt;br /&gt;
and I(0)~(delta_rho*Volume)^2~MW^2,
&lt;br /&gt;
I.e. for the dimer, the forward scattering would be 4 times larger compared to monomer, if the hydration shell would not be taken into account (you could easily check this by running Crysol with zero contrast of the shell).
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
As you mention yourself, the shell of the two cubes side by side is different 
&lt;br /&gt;
from the two shells of the two individual cubes and therefore the ratio of four
&lt;br /&gt;
is hold only approximately for the forward scattering intensities of a dimer and a monomer computed by Crysol&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>PDB Oriented Tools</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=564#564" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1733</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ab Initio Methods :: RE: choosing the correct model's symmetry</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1732#1732</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:13:15 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1732#1732</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 16:13 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Judging from NSD values those mostly around 1.0 (except those with P222
&lt;br /&gt;
symmetry), the models should be similar.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Ab Initio Methods</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1172#1172" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1732</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mixtures and Flexible Systems :: RE: unit of q values in oligomer</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1731#1731</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:09:08 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1731#1731</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 16:09 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
If you have the smax value of 5 in your data, then it is most probably in nm^-1 and you need to use /un 2
&lt;br /&gt;
But the formfactors have to be computed up to 0.5 (A^-1)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Mixtures and Flexible Systems</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1620#1620" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1731</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mixtures and Flexible Systems :: RE: limits of bunch and eom</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1730#1730</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:04:20 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1730#1730</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 16:04 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Why not start it once interactively and note all the answers in an answer file?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Mixtures and Flexible Systems</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1541#1541" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1730</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>PDB Oriented Tools :: RE: Prediction of scattering from dimers in Crysol</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1729#1729</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:59:36 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1729#1729</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=22332&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;tankozavr&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 15:59 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Hi! Thanks for your reply. I would like to clarify this further if possible. 
&lt;br /&gt;
Mw of the dimer is obviously twice of that of the monomer, concentration of the dimerized protein should be 2 times lower. The surface of the dimer cannot be that easily determined, I believe it depends on the dimer nature. (just by stucking 2 spheres or 2 cubes we are getting smaller surface and smaller surface/mass ratio, but we do get larger suface itself for a single  particle) I would initially think that hydration shell of a dimer will depend on the protein nature and surface area, is this correct?
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
My sincere apologies if my questions and reasoning are quite simple or silly but I am wondering where am I wrong in it.
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks !&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>tankozavr</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>PDB Oriented Tools</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=564#564" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1729</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mixtures and Flexible Systems :: RE: Residue limit in RanCh</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1728#1728</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:51:01 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1728#1728</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 15:51 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Please try to split the lines in the sequence file&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Mixtures and Flexible Systems</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1293#1293" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1728</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ab Initio Methods :: RE: dammif with very large complex</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1727#1727</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1727#1727</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 15:49 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
Normally, the data must be cut up to the first good data point as defined
&lt;br /&gt;
by AutoRg. If this results in the warning in Gnom (Dmax x Smin &amp;gt; Pi),
&lt;br /&gt;
than the Dmax and the models should be treated with caution.
&lt;br /&gt;
In general, if you have a protein-DNA complex it is better to use Monsa (given that the scattering curve from DNA alone or protein alone is available),
&lt;br /&gt;
as Dammin is applicable to uniform, density particles only.
&lt;br /&gt;
But for 5% of DNA it is probably still OK.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Ab Initio Methods</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1373#1373" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1727</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ab Initio Methods :: RE: chi square, Rvalue, fit</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1726#1726</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:42:28 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1726#1726</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 15:42 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
R-value concerns the regularized smooth data
&lt;br /&gt;
whereas chi operates with the raw experimental data.
&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore Chi is the decisive parameter.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Ab Initio Methods</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1391#1391" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1726</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Literature :: RE: Reference for ATSAS online</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1725#1725</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:40:06 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1725#1725</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 15:40 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
This one may be relevant
&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;
Petoukhov, M.V., Konarev, P.V., Kikhney A.G. &amp;amp; Svergun, D.I. (2007) ATSAS 2.1 - towards automated and web-supported small-angle scattering data analysis. J. Appl. Cryst. 40, s223-s228&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Literature</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1396#1396" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1725</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ab Initio Methods :: RE: MONSA - average jobs</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1724#1724</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1724#1724</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 15:33 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
You could try the modified version of damaver at
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.embl-hamburg.de/~maxim/addon/monsaver.zip&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.embl-hamburg.de/~maxim/addon/monsaver.zip&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
which is however not an &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; part of Atsas package&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Ab Initio Methods</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1470#1470" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1724</comments>
</item>
<item>
<title>Rigid Body Modelling :: RE: asymmetric homodimer</title>
<link>http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1723#1723</link>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:15:55 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1723#1723</guid>
<description>Author: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saxier.org/forum/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&amp;u=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;SaxsMax&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;

Posted: 2010.08.30 15:15 (GMT 1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span class="postbody"&gt;
It is not very clear if you finally used the symmetry constraint or not.
&lt;br /&gt;
By design, Bunch is only able to handle the cases with one chain per 
&lt;br /&gt;
asymmetric part, i.e. the dimer must be run with P2 symmetry which imposes that the two-fold axes of N- and C- termini coincide.
&lt;br /&gt;
We plan to distribute a new program in the next release of Atsas
&lt;br /&gt;
which would be able to handle complicated cases like yours.
&lt;br /&gt;
One more thing about Bunch: the length of the linkers must be 
&lt;br /&gt;
at least four DRs otherwise some domains may stuck though they 
&lt;br /&gt;
were not fixed.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
<dc:creator>SaxsMax</dc:creator>
<dc:subject>Rigid Body Modelling</dc:subject>
<annotate:reference rdf:resource="http://www.saxier.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1354#1354" />
<comments>http://www.saxier.org/forum/posting.php?mode=quote&amp;p=1723</comments>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Page generation time: 0.8576s  - Memory Usage: 3.847 Mb  - GZIP disabled -->