SAXS Forum Index SAXS
Small Angle X-ray Scattering Initiative for Europe :: Forum
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

asymmetric homodimer

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SAXS Forum Index -> Rigid Body Modelling
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guenter
Guest


Joined: 23 Feb 2010
Posts: 1
Institute, Location: SBS, Liverpool

PostPosted: 2010.02.23 16:47    Post subject: asymmetric homodimer Reply with quote

Dear Bunch developers and users,
This question has to do with a specific domain arrangement of a homodimer that I would like to explore with Bunch. An N-terminal domain and a C-terminal domain form this specific dimer. The domain in the middle, however, is not involved in protein-protein contacts and there are mobile linkers between N- and middle domains as well as middle and C-terminal domains. This means that a two-fold symmetry can only be defined in either only the N-terminal domain or the C-terminal domain (i.e. both have different symmetry axes). Running Bunch with two-fold symmetry constraint is therefore not providing the correct picture.
Thus in my present Bunch runs I am keeping the N-terminal domains fixed (to maintain their domain interaction characteristics) and let all the other domains move “freely”. In order to preserve interactions in the dimer formed by the C-terminal domains I have defined a contacts condition file as constraint. This ought to do the job, I thought... But looking at the produced result and comparing it with the initial structure it became clear that not only the (position of the) N-terminal domains dimer remains unchanged (as defined) but also one of the C-terminal domains does not change its spatial position at all (i.e. limiting the exploration of spatial positions of the C-terminal dimer severely) thus behaving like a fixed subunit in coordinate space (even though having defined it to be mobile). Is there a difficulty with Bunch in running this particular arrangement? Could there be a problem with regards to the definition of the centre of mass or the contacts condition file, which causes one of the C-terminal domains not deviating from its initial position? I would be very grateful for any advice you can give me. Thank you very much in advance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SaxsMax
Administrator


Joined: 03 Aug 2007
Posts: 178

PostPosted: 2010.08.30 15:15    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is not very clear if you finally used the symmetry constraint or not.
By design, Bunch is only able to handle the cases with one chain per
asymmetric part, i.e. the dimer must be run with P2 symmetry which imposes that the two-fold axes of N- and C- termini coincide.
We plan to distribute a new program in the next release of Atsas
which would be able to handle complicated cases like yours.
One more thing about Bunch: the length of the linkers must be
at least four DRs otherwise some domains may stuck though they
were not fixed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    SAXS Forum Index -> Rigid Body Modelling All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Protected by Anti-Spam ACP