Guenter Guest
Joined: 23 Feb 2010 Posts: 1 Institute, Location: SBS, Liverpool
|
Posted: 2010.02.23 16:47 Post subject: asymmetric homodimer |
|
|
Dear Bunch developers and users,
This question has to do with a specific domain arrangement of a homodimer that I would like to explore with Bunch. An N-terminal domain and a C-terminal domain form this specific dimer. The domain in the middle, however, is not involved in protein-protein contacts and there are mobile linkers between N- and middle domains as well as middle and C-terminal domains. This means that a two-fold symmetry can only be defined in either only the N-terminal domain or the C-terminal domain (i.e. both have different symmetry axes). Running Bunch with two-fold symmetry constraint is therefore not providing the correct picture.
Thus in my present Bunch runs I am keeping the N-terminal domains fixed (to maintain their domain interaction characteristics) and let all the other domains move “freely”. In order to preserve interactions in the dimer formed by the C-terminal domains I have defined a contacts condition file as constraint. This ought to do the job, I thought... But looking at the produced result and comparing it with the initial structure it became clear that not only the (position of the) N-terminal domains dimer remains unchanged (as defined) but also one of the C-terminal domains does not change its spatial position at all (i.e. limiting the exploration of spatial positions of the C-terminal dimer severely) thus behaving like a fixed subunit in coordinate space (even though having defined it to be mobile). Is there a difficulty with Bunch in running this particular arrangement? Could there be a problem with regards to the definition of the centre of mass or the contacts condition file, which causes one of the C-terminal domains not deviating from its initial position? I would be very grateful for any advice you can give me. Thank you very much in advance. |
|