I'm currently using CRYSOL to compare experimental SAXS data to crystal structure of a complex. I tested in parallel 2 data sets. The first one, using the buffer subtracted curves.dat gives a better fit that the one using a truncated buffer subtracted curves.dat (where I have removed noisy parts of the curve).
Could you explain me why?
Many thanks for your help
Calculation of SAXS and SANS profiles (CRYSOL, CRYSON), superposition of models (SUPCOMB, DAMAVER, DAMCLUST), database DARA
1 post • Page 1 of 1