SAXS

Small Angle X-ray Scattering Initiative for Europe :: Forum
It is currently 2017.04.28 19:52

All times are UTC + 2 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: 2016.07.13 17:12 
Offline
Member

Joined: 2016.04.14 12:57
Posts: 11
Hey everyone,

I have a protein that oligomerises into long multimers that has an Rg of >300Angstroms. The last time I put it under HPLC-SAXS it eluted in the void volume and it was too big for the camera length. The concentration I used previously was 5 mg/ml. I'm having another beamtime next week and I'm putting the protein in different buffers ranging in concentration of salts and pH to test the effects on the oligomerisation of the protein. I also wanted to change the camera lenght in such a away that it would fit the data for the protein. Hwoever, the beamline scientist told me that the camera length could not be changed currently. Is there any other way of accomodating large samples without changing the camera length? I'm thinking of lowering the sample concentration but also looking for other options as well.

any ideas? :O


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 2016.07.13 20:13 
Offline
Active member

Joined: 2007.08.09 21:10
Posts: 686
Location: Planet Earth
Quote:
The last time I put it under HPLC-SAXS it eluted in the void volume and it was too big for the camera length

I think you mean a distance between detector and a sample. At some beamlines this can be adjusted.

Quote:
I also wanted to change the camera lenght in such a away that it would fit the data for the protein.

do you not see the Guinier region? in other words, why exactly do you want to change detector-sample distance?

I recall some work by Vestergaard and co-workers who studied fibrillation and saw fibrils up to 900A in Dmax, which was
actually at that time the max theoretical possible distance one could see:). Perhaps, this can be helpful and
perhaps you can consider a different beamline:
https://www.embl-hamburg.de/biosaxs/cou ... rgaard.pdf

HTH, Alex


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 2016.07.19 10:43 
Offline
Administrator
User avatar

Joined: 2007.08.03 18:55
Posts: 567
Location: EMBL Hamburg, Germany
2107086a wrote:
Hwoever, the beamline scientist told me that the camera length could not be changed currently. Is there any other way of accomodating large samples without changing the camera length?
Well, at some beamlines it is possible to change the wavelength.
Basically the smallest angle you need should be qmin < 1/Rg = 0.003 1/A.
Or qmin < pi/Dmax (which is roughly the same value).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 2 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group